MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Hume's philosophy and hair distribution
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

134 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
134 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 134 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 134 of 134 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/b978-2-294-73068-9.00014-1
2000· book-chapter· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0000-0000(03)47404-4
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Hume Studies Referees, 2001-2002
Philip Damien Cummins
2002· article· en· Hume studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Hume Studies Referees, 2014–2015
2014· article· en· Hume studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
David Hume: Reason in History (review)
Timothy M. Costelloe
2004· article· en· Hume studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Disputatio. Précis de Internai Logic
Yvon Gauthier, Richard Zach, Mathieu Marion, Fabrice Correia
2004· article· fr· Philosophiques· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
oeuvre economique de David Hume
Albert. Schatz
2009· book· fr· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Impressions of Hume (review)
Adam Potkay
2005· article· en· Hume studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
A Companion to Hume (review)
Barry Stroud
2009· article· en· Hume studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
Interview avec Marco Di Agostino
Hédi Bouraoui
2015· article· fr· Revue CMC· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About