MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 31 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Renegotiating the Bargain
2025· book· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Measuring Legislative Boundaries
Christopher P. Chambers, Alan D. Miller
2010· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Preface
Tom Flanagan
2022· book-chapter· fr· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A Theory of Blanket Recommendations
Doron Levit, Anton Tsoy
2018· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Strategic Voting with Ethical Voters
Christopher Li
2013· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Results of the 2012 Society Election
Pierre Marion, William Hayes, Peter Wharton
2012· article· en· SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Pivotality
Arvind Magesan, Dimitri Migrow
2024· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
functions_survey.R
Gabriel López-Moctezuma, Léonard Wantchekon, Daniel Rubenson, Thomas Fujiwara, Pe Lero Cecilia
2020· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Acknowledgments
2019· book-chapter· en· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Party Discipline
Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, Kaare W. Strøm, Christopher Kam
2014· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Ideology Trap
Anke S. Kessler
2016· article· en· PET 16 - Rio· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About