MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,718 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,718 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 33 of 35

Labels cover 5 of 1,718 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,718 of 1,718 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Pretend Play
Scott J. Robson, Valerie A. Kuhlmeier
2022· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Unpacking Planning Fallacy
Martin W. Huang
2021· article· en· International Journal of Psychological Studies· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conclusion to Part II
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Coda
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Abstract words are hard to acquire; Does social relevance help?
Faris Mahmood, Emiko J. Muraki, Veronica Diveica, Richard J. Binney, Andrea B. Protzner, Penny M. Pexman
2025· article· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Appendix: Evaluating Evidence
Marisa Bortolussi, Peter Dixon
2002· other· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Correction to: Formal Developments
Rainer Dick
2024· book-chapter· en· Graduate texts in physics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Viability of Rationalism
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conclusion to Part IV
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Argument from Neural Wiring
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cognitive Ethology
Christina Stiso
2016· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conclusion to Part III
Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis
2024· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About