MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 34 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Backreaction: Gauge and frame dependences
Iain A. Brown, Joey Latta, A. A. Coley
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Contracting cosmologies and the swampland
Heliudson Bernardo, Robert Brandenberger
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Gravitational Bhabha scattering
A. F. Santos, F. C. Khanna
2017· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Hawking Radiation-A Augmentation Attrition Model
K.N.P. Kumar, B S Kiranagi, C. S. Bagewadi
2012· article· en· Advances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quasi-geodesics in relativistic gravity
2021· article· en· The European Physical Journal C· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affaboutunlabeled
New type of hill-top inflation
2016· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Extended Born-Infeld theory and the bouncing magnetic universe
M. Novello, J. M. Salim, Aline N. Araújo
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Near-Milne realization of scale-invariant fluctuations
João Magueijo
2007· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Gravitational closure of matter field equations
Maximilian Düll, F. Schüller, Nadine Stritzelberger, Florian Wolz
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Numerical relativity and high energy physics: Recent developments
Emanuele Berti, Vítor Cardoso, Luís C. B. Crispino, Leonardo Gualtieri, Carlos Herdeiro, Ulrich Sperhake
2016· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Patchy screening of the CMB from dark photons
Dalila Pîrvu, Junwu Huang, Matthew C. Johnson
2024· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmic microwave background and scalar-tensor theories of gravity
Chris Clarkson, A. A. Coley, Eric O’Neill
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
Effective fluid mixture of tensor-multi-scalar gravity
Marcello Miranda, Pierre-Antoine Graham, Valerio Faraoni
2023· article· en· The European Physical Journal Plus· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
Late time modification of structure growth and the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> tension
Mengxiang Lin, Bhuvnesh Jain, Marco Raveri, Eric J. Baxter, C. Chang, M. Gatti +2 more
2024· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
1 Primordial Magnetism in CMB B-modes
Levon Pogosian, Tanmay Vachaspati, Amit Yadav
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
fundno affunlabeled
LiteBIRD science goals and forecasts: primordial magnetic fields
D. Paoletti, J. A. Rubiño-Martín, Maresuke Shiraishi, D. Molinari, Jens Chluba, F. Finelli⋆ +93 more
2024· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About