MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The Lancet
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,654 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,654 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 34 of 54

Labels cover 27 of 2,654 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,654 of 2,654 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Not a broken heart
Harriette G.C. Van Spall, Jason D. Roberts, Anna M. Sawka, Carol J. Swallow, Susanna Mak
2007· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
DNA and immigration: the ethical ramifications
Jackie Taitz, JEM Weekers, D Mosca
2002· article· en· The Lancet· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mendelian randomisation, triglycerides, and CHD
Guillaume Paré, Sonia S. Anand
2010· letter· en· The Lancet· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bringing JUPITER down to earth
Jean‐Pierre Després
2009· letter· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gender bias in academia
Jamie Lundine, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault, Jocalyn Clark, Shirin Heidari, Dina Balabanova
2019· letter· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Pertussis vaccination beyond childhood
Gaston De Serres, Bernard Duval
2005· article· en· The Lancet· Immunology and Microbiology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Is GSK guilty of fraud?
The Lancet
2004· editorial· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
15
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Altruistic kidney donation
Willem Weimar, Willij C. Zuidema, Marry de Klerk, Bernadette Haase‐Kromwijk, Jan N.M. IJzermans
2006· letter· it· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Unravelling the disease process
Peter St George‐Hyslop, Martin N. Rossor
2001· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Klaus Schiller
Ruth Williams
2010· article· de· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About