MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,989 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,989 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 35 of 40

Labels cover 4 of 1,989 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,989 of 1,989 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study to Evaluate Changes in Sexuality in Patients With Primary Cervical Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (JGOG9004, SARAH Study), and Our Approaches to Solving the Unmet Needs of Patients With Gynecological Cancer
Hitomi Sakai, Yoshio Itani, Yoichi Kobayashi, Mikiko Asai‐Sato, Kazuto Tasaki, Shoji Nagao +13 more
2023· article· en· Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
PO34
Devin Van Elburg, Sarah Quirk, Kevin Martell, Tyler Meyer, Michael Roumeliotis
2023· article· en· Brachytherapy· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
GPP09  Presentation Time: 10:00 AM
Michael Kudla, Deidre Batchelar, Jocelyn Moore, François Bachand
2022· article· en· Brachytherapy· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
PO08
Jill A. Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink
2023· article· en· Brachytherapy· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
To the editor
C. Blake Gilks, Amy Jamieson, Jessica N. McAlpine, Naveena Singh
2023· letter· en· Gynecologic Oncology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Endometrial Cancer
David M. Quinlan
2006· article· en· Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Endometrial Cancer
Sofia A. Ierullo
2025· article· en· Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About