MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322012051 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100876

21TiP Molecular alterations predictive of outcome in early staged cervical cancer: A translational investigation in the international validation study of sentinel node biopsy in early cervical cancer SENTICOL III

2023· article· en· W4322012051 on OpenAlexaff
M. El Gani, Sabrina Ibadioune, Z. El Beaino, Sophie Vacher, Alexandre Degnieau, Emmanuelle Jeannot, Julien Masliah‐Planchon, Anne Vincent‐Salomon, Martial Caly, Glauco Baiocchi, G. Guitmann, M. Plante, David Cibula, Vanna Zanagnolo, Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson, Patrice Mathevet, M. Kamal, Fabrice Lécuru, Ivan Bièche

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical cancerMedicineStage (stratigraphy)OncologySentinel nodeBiopsyCancerInternal medicineBiologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical cancer remains the second cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Despite of good histological and clinical features, some patients relapse after the treatment of early stage cervical cancer. Recent studies identified correlation between some genetic alterations and poor prognosis in advanced-staged cervical cancer. Yet, the literature remains scarce about molecular alterations and outcome correlation in early stage cervical cancer. Our translational study investigate recurrent molecular alterations predictive of outcome in early stage cervical cancer. We included the first 100 patients randomized in the Senticol III trial. This large multicentric, prospective, randomized, and international “validation study” tries to validate sentinel node biopsy as nodal staging of early cervical cancers (stage Ia – IIa1). Cervical tumor slides with contributive FFPE sample are analyzed and stratified based on well-established histological criteria (SEDLIS criteria). The immune microenvironment characteristics including TIL’s infiltration and PDL1 expression. PDL1 expression is assessed by IHC using the 22C3 antibody and quantified using CPS score. We made HPV detection and typing by PCR of the tumor samples. We performed DNA and RNA extractions from the FFPE tumor specimens. Using the dedicated gene panel developed by our team, we analyzed 571 genes commonly altered in cancer. We performed high throughput RNA sequencing to establish the gene expression profile of each tumor and its associated stroma. The genomic and transcriptomic analysis assessed the tumor mutational load, the most frequently altered genes and their expression. The biostatistical analyses will correlate molecular alterations, histopathological and clinical classical features, with patient outcome. The different parameters will be first analyzed independently (univariate analysis) and then in a multiparametric manner (logistic regression). NCT03386734. Fabrice Lecuru, MD PhD. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207