MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Legal principles and applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,078 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,078 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 35 of 42

Labels cover 1 of 2,078 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,078 of 2,078 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundaboutunlabeled
Property’s limits
Larissa Katz
2022· article· de· Jurisprudence· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Index
G. O. Ryabova, D. J. Asher, M. Campbell‐Brown
2019· paratext· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Keeping Settlements Secret
Erik S. Knutsen
2009· article· en· Florida State University law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Labour
Favián Alejandro Martín
2017· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Acknowledgements
2014· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The Snowdon Trust
2018· book-chapter· en· Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Is Formalism inevitable?
Katrina M. Wyman
2007· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editor’s Note for Issue 9(4)
Dennis R. Young
2019· article· en· Nonprofit Policy Forum· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Biggest Legal Mind We Have
Mark Walters
2020· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Index
Hong-Chuan Yang, Mohamed‐Slim Alouini
2020· paratext· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Property
Richard Frimpong Oppong
2013· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Credits
James Tully
2008· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Seduction of a Law Professor
Shauna Van Praagh
2013· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Unequal transactions
Stephen Waddams
2011· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
INVASION OF CANADA
Henry Adams
2012· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About