MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 36 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Debating the future of physics publishing
J. Harnad, R. J. Reeves, Basil Polychronopulos, John Chubb
2007· article· en· Physics World· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenuegpt · metaresearch+bibliometricsgrok · metaresearch+bibliometrics+scholarly_communicationopus · metaresearch+bibliometricsmodels split
Are We Ready for an Impact Factor?
Marcia Finlayson, William C. Miller
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Le système universitaire canadien
2015· book-chapter· fr· Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Preface
Liwen Vaughan, Wolfgang Glänzel
2006· article· en· Scientometrics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Tiny department tops research rankings
Peter Gwynne
2005· article· en· Physics World· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Science as a money-spinner?
Henri H. Versteeg, Marc Rodger
2016· editorial· en· Thrombosis Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
One year (almost) with the Open Access Authors Fund
Andrew Waller
2009· article· en· E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Members among New Andrew Carnegie Fellows
Sean P. Kelly, Daniel Kirsch, Sergei Kostiaev, Christopher Alcantara, David Fott, Carsten T. Vala +1 more
2015· article· en· PS Political Science & Politics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Providing open access to research, one article at a time
Tim Lougheed
2005· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Open Collaboration
Denise Smith, Olga Perkovic, Gabriela Mircea
2018· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometrics+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Open Access Policy Update
Heather Morrison
2007· article· en· E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Open access: the way of the future?
Andrew Waller
2004· article· en· E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutgemma · metaresearch+open_sciencegpt · open_science+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Factors influencing Canadian HASS researchers’ open access publishing practices
Philips Ayeni, Rebekah Willson
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About