MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Methods in molecular biology
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,129 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20022025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,129 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 37 of 63

Labels cover 13 of 3,129 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,129 of 3,129 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
In Vitro Models in Developmental Toxicology
Louise M. Winn
2019· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rabbit Whole Embryo Culture
Terence Ozolins
2019· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mouse Whole Embryo Culture
Emily W. Y. Tung, Louise M. Winn
2019· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Evidence-Based Decision Making 3: Health Technology Assessment
Daria O’Reilly, Richard Audas, Kaitryn Campbell, Meredith Vanstone, James M. Bowen, Lisa Schwartz +2 more
2021· book-chapter· en· Methods in molecular biology· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Biomimetics and Stem Cells
Gordana Vunjak‐Novakovic, Kursad Turksen
2014· book· en· Methods in molecular biology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Use of the Comet Assay in Environmental Toxicology
Loren D. Knopper, James P. McNamee
2008· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Nora A. Foroud, Jonathan A. D. Neilson
2023· book· en· Methods in molecular biology· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Peptidomics
2024· book· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
In Vivo Evaluation of Single-Exon and Multiexon Skipping in mdx52 Mice
Yoshitaka Mizobe, Shouta Miyatake, Hotake Takizawa, Yuko Hara–Azumi, Toshifumi Yokota, Akinori Nakamura +2 more
2018· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundunlabeled
MR Oximetry
Jeff F. Dunn
2011· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
X-Ray Fluorescence-Detected Flow Cytometry
Andrew M. Crawford, James E. Penner‐Hahn
2018· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A CRISPR Platform for Targeted In Vivo Screens
Vincent Maranda, Yue Zhang, Frederick S. Vizeacoumar, Andrew Freywald, Franco J. Vizeacoumar
2023· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Studying Leukocyte Recruitment Under Flow Conditions
Sean A. Parsons, Christophe Jurzinsky, Susan L. Cuvelier, Kamala D. Patel
2012· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Pharmacogenomics in Children
Michael Rieder
2014· review· en· Methods in molecular biology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Genome Editing of C. elegans
Takuma Sugi
2017· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Mouse Phenotyping with MRI
Xianhao Chen, Brian J. Nieman
2011· article· en· Methods in molecular biology· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About