MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 38 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Higgs vacuum decay from particle collisions?
Leopoldo Cuspinera, Ruth Gregory, Katie M. Marshall, Ian G. Moss
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
The Cartan algorithm in five dimensions
D. D. McNutt, A. A. Coley, A. Forget
2017· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
A holographic quantum Hall ferromagnet
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
Celestial geometry
Sebastian Mizera, Sabrina Pasterski
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the reconstruction problem in quantum gravity
Mathijs Fraaije, Alessia Platania, Frank Saueressig
2022· article· en· Radboud Repository (Radboud University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Remarks on 2D quantum cosmology
Dionysios Anninos, Chiara Baracco, Beatrix Mühlmann
2024· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
Circuit Complexity from Cosmological Islands
Sayantan Choudhury, Satyaki Chowdhury, Sudhakar Panda, Abinash Swain, Nitin Gupta, Anurag Mishara +3 more
2021· preprint· en· Preprints.org· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Matrix strings in a <i>B</i>-field
G. Grignani, Marta Orselli, Gordon W. Semenoff
2001· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
Engineering holographic graphene
Gordon W. Semenoff
2012· article· en· AIP conference proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Towards causal patch physics in dS/CFT
Yasha Neiman
2018· article· en· EPJ Web of Conferences· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Braneworld localisation in hyperbolic spacetime
Benedict Crampton, C.N. Pope, K.S. Stelle
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Geometry of Lax pairs: Particle motion and Killing-Yano tensors
Marco Cariglia, Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, David Kubizňák
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Boundary kinematic space
Andreas Karch, James Sully, Christoph F. Uhlemann, Devin G. E. Walker
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Stationary strings near a higher-dimensional rotating black hole
Valeri P. Frolov, Kory A Stevens
2004· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Determining a Riemannian metric from minimal areas
Spyros Alexakis, Tracey Balehowsky, Adrian Nachman
2020· article· en· Advances in Mathematics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Holographic Higgs phases
2012· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Bulk spectral functions in single and multiscalar gravity duals
Todd Springer, Charles Gale, Sangyong Jeon
2010· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Thurston Geometries from Eleven Dimensions
J. Gegenberg, Sachindeo Vaidya
2002· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Tate’s thesis in the de Rham setting
Justin Hilburn, Sam Raskin
2022· article· en· Journal of the American Mathematical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Universal area product for black holes: A heuristic argument
Don N. Page, Andrey A. Shoom
2015· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bottom-up holographic models for cosmology
Chris Waddell
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About