Multi-fractional instantons in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory on the twisted $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bstract We construct analytical self-dual Yang-Mills fractional instanton solutions on a four-torus $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 with ’t Hooft twisted boundary conditions. These instantons possess topological charge $$ Q=\frac{r}{N} $$ Q = r N , where 1 ≤ r < N . To implement the twist, we employ SU( N ) transition functions that satisfy periodicity conditions up to center elements and are embedded into SU( k ) × SU( ℓ ) × U(1) ⊂ SU( N ), where ℓ + k = N . The self-duality requirement imposes a condition, kL 1 L 2 = rℓL 3 L 4 , on the lengths of the periods of $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 and yields solutions with abelian field strengths. However, by introducing a detuning parameter ∆ ≡ ( rℓL 3 L 4 – kL 1 L 2 )/ $$ \sqrt{L_1{L}_2{L}_3{L}_4} $$ L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 , we generate self-dual nonabelian solutions on a general $$ {\mathbbm{T}}^4 $$ T 4 as an expansion in powers of ∆. We explore the moduli spaces associated with these solutions and find that they exhibit intricate structures. Solutions with topological charges greater than $$ \frac{1}{N} $$ 1 N and k ≠ r possess non-compact moduli spaces, along which the $$ \mathcal{O}\left(\Delta \right) $$ O ∆ gauge-invariant densities exhibit runaway behavior. On the other hand, solutions with $$ Q=\frac{r}{N} $$ Q = r N and k = r have compact moduli spaces, whose coordinates correspond to the allowed holonomies in the SU( r ) color space. These solutions can be represented as a sum over r lumps centered around the r distinct holonomies, thus resembling a liquid of instantons. In addition, we show that each lump supports 2 adjoint fermion zero modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".