MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,873 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,873 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 38 of 78

Labels cover 1 of 3,873 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,873 of 3,873 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
The<i>Herschel</i>Virgo Cluster Survey
M. Grossi, L. K. Hunt, S. C. Madden, T. M. Hughes, R. Auld, M. Baes +19 more
2014· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
The occurrence of classical Cepheids in binary systems
Hilding R. Neilson, F. R. N. Schneider, R. G. Izzard, Nancy Remage Evans, N. Langer
2014· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Cool stars in the Galactic center as seen by APOGEE
M. Schultheis, Á. Rojas-Arriagada, Kátia Cunha, M. Zoccali, C. Chiappini, Gail Zasowski +9 more
2020· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
afffundunlabeled
Abundance anomalies in pre-main-sequence stars
M. Vick, G. Michaud, J. Richer, O. Richard
2010· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
The survey of planetary nebulae in Andromeda (M31)
M. Arnaboldi, Souradeep Bhattacharya, Ortwin Gerhard, Chiaki Kobayashi, K. C. Freeman, Nelson Caldwell +3 more
2022· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Proximate molecular quasar absorbers
P. Noterdaeme, S. A. Balashev, Jens-Kristian Krogager, R. Srianand, H. Fathivavsari, P. Petitjean +1 more
2019· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)
D. Vergani, B. Garilli, M. Polletta, P. Franzetti, M. Scodeggio, G. Zamorani +33 more
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
afffundunlabeled
Properties of galactic B[e] supergiants
А. С. Мирошниченко, H. Levato⋆, K. S. Bjorkman, M. Grosso, N. Manset, A. Men’shchikov +6 more
2004· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Euclid</i> preparation
C. Giocoli, M. Meneghetti, Elena Rasia, S. Borgani, Giulia Despali, G. F. Lesci +203 more
2023· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
27
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Hyper Suprime-Cam view of the CMASS galaxy sample
Alessandro Sonnenfeld, Wenting Wang, Neta A. Bahcall
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i> intermediate results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini +133 more
2018· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
Fossil group origins
S. Zarattini, J. A. L. Aguerri, Rubén Sánchez-Janssen, R. Barrena, W. Boschin, C. del Burgo +8 more
2015· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
The magnetic Bp star 36 Lyncis
G. A. Wade, M. A. Smith, D. Bohlender, T. Ryabchikova, C. T. Bolton, T. Lueftinger +5 more
2006· preprint· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About