MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

872 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
872 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 18

Labels cover 1 of 872 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 872 of 872 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
PIE-NET: Parametric Inference of Point Cloud Edges
Xiaogang Wang, Yuelang Xu, Kai Xu, Andrea Tagliasacchi, Bin Zhou, Ali Mahdavi‐Amiri +1 more
2020· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
SurfaceBrush
Enrique Rosales, Jafet Rodríguez, Alla Sheffer
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affunlabeled
Functionality preserving shape style transfer
Zhaoliang Lun, Evangelos Kalogerakis, Rui Wang, Alla Sheffer
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Stochastic Poisson Surface Reconstruction
Silvia Sellán, Alec Jacobson
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
affunlabeled
Mean-Value Geometry Encoding
Vladislav Kraevoy, Alla Sheffer
2006· article· en· International Journal of Shape Modeling· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Computational LEGO technic design
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
affunlabeled
MapTree
Jing Ren, Simone Melzi, Maks Ovsjanikov, Peter Wonka
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
afffundunlabeled
Spelunking the deep
Nicholas Sharp, Alec Jacobson
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affunlabeled
Modeling Character Canvases from Cartoon Drawings
Mikhail Bessmeltsev, Nicholas Vining, Alla Sheffer, Karan Singh
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affunlabeled
VIPER
Baptiste Angles, Daniel Rebain, Miles Macklin, Brian Wyvill, Loïc Barthe, JP Lewis +5 more
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affunlabeled
Freeform Honeycomb Structures
Caigui Jiang, Jun Wang, Johannes Wallner, Helmut Pottmann
2014· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
afffundunlabeled
Cubic stylization
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Curve Style Analysis in a Set of Shapes
H. Li, Hao Zhang, Yuan Wang, Junjie Cao, Ariel Shamir, Daniel Cohen‐Or
2013· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
TM-NET
Lin Gao, Tong Wu, Yujie Yuan, Ming-Xian Lin, Yu‐Kun Lai, Hao Zhang
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Image-Based Variational Meshing
Orçun Göksel, Septimiu E. Salcudean
2010· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Medial Spheres for Shape Approximation
Svetlana Stolpner, Paul G. Kry, Kaleem Siddiqi
2011· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
Eulerian solid simulation with contact
David I. W. Levin, Joshua Litven, Garrett L. Jones, Shinjiro Sueda, Dinesh K. Pai
2011· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
Direct delta mush skinning and variants
Binh Huy Le, John Lewis
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About