MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2549722038 · doi:10.1145/2980179.2980237

Functionality preserving shape style transfer

2016· article· en· W2549722038 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Graphics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSimilarity (geometry)SalientContext (archaeology)Metric (unit)Point (geometry)Style (visual arts)Artificial intelligenceGeometric primitiveGeometryMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When geometric models with a desired combination of style and functionality are not available, they currently need to be created manually. We facilitate algorithmic synthesis of 3D models of man-made shapes which combines user-specified style, described via an exemplar shape, and functionality, encoded by a functionally different target shape. Our method automatically transfers the style of the exemplar to the target, creating the desired combination. The main challenge in performing cross-functional style transfer is to implicitly separate an object's style from its function: while stylistically the output shapes should be as close as possible to the exemplar, their original functionality and structure, as encoded by the target, should be strictly preserved. Recent literature point to the presence of similarly shaped, salient geometric elements as a main indicator of stylistic similarity between 3D shapes. We therefore transfer the exemplar style to the target via a sequence of element-level operations. We allow only compatible operations, ones that do not affect the target functionality. To this end, we introduce a cross-structural element compatibility metric that estimates the impact of each operation on the edited shape. Our metric is based on the global context and coarse geometry of evaluated elements, and is trained on databases of 3D objects. We use this metric to cast style transfer as a tabu search, which incrementally updates the target shape using compatible operations, progressively increasing its style similarity to the exemplar while strictly maintaining its functionality at each step. We evaluate our framework across a range of man-made objects including furniture, light fixtures, and tableware, and perform a number of user studies confirming that it produces convincing outputs combining the desired style and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it