MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Sharp boundaries for the swampland
Simon Caron-Huot, Dalimil Mazáč, Leonardo Rastelli, David Simmons–Duffin
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
181
citations
afffundunlabeled
The S-matrix in twistor space
Nima Arkani–Hamed, Freddy Cachazo, Clifford Cheung, Jared Kaplan
2010· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Cold nuclear matter in holographic QCD
Moshe Rozali, Hsien-Hang Shieh, Mark Van Raamsdonk, Jackson M. S. Wu
2008· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
affunlabeled
Extremal effective field theories
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
173
citations
affunlabeled
Momentum-space entanglement and renormalization in quantum field theory
Vijay Balasubramanian, Michael B. McDermott, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
173
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Holographic charged Rényi entropies
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
172
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Action Principle for Newtonian Gravity
Dennis Schrøder Hansen, Jelle Hartong, Niels A. Obers
2019· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
172
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thermodynamics of Accelerating Black Holes
Michael Appels, Ruth Gregory, David Kubizňák
2016· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
171
citations
affunlabeled
Comments on quantum gravity and entanglement
Mark Van Raamsdonk
2009· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
169
citations
affunlabeled
BRANE TILINGS
Kristian D. Kennaway
2007· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
167
citations
afffundunlabeled
Mutual information and the F-theorem
Horacio Casini, Marina Huerta, Robert C. Myers, Alexandre Yale
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
166
citations
fundno affunlabeled
D3-brane potentials from fluxes in AdS/CFT
Daniel Baumann, Anatoly Dymarsky, Shamit Kachru, Igor R. Klebanov, Liam McAllister
2010· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
164
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black holes as bubble nucleation sites
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
163
citations
affunlabeled
Classification of the Weyl Tensor in Higher-Dimensions
Robert Milson, Vojtěch Pravda, A. Pravdová
2004· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
162
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A note on CFT correlators in three dimensions
Simone Giombi, Shiroman Prakash, Xi Yin
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Transverse Fivebranes in Matrix Theory
Juan Maldacena, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations
affunlabeled
Local Hawking temperature for dynamical black holes
Sean A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, Luciano Vanzo, Sergio Zerbini
2009· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
161
citations
affunlabeled
M2-branes on M-folds
Jacques Distler, Sunil Mukhi, Constantinos Papageorgakis
2013· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
159
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Lifshitz solutions of D=10 and D=11 supergravity
Aristomenis Donos, Jerome P. Gauntlett
2010· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
156
citations
afffundunlabeled
Scattering Amplitudes from Intersection Theory
Sebastian Mizera
2018· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
156
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Superstars and giant gravitons
Robert C. Myers, Øyvind Tafjord
2001· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
156
citations
afffundunlabeled
Vertex algebras at the corner
Davide Gaiotto, Miroslav Rapčák
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
154
citations
affunlabeled
Averaging over Narain moduli space
2020· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
152
citations
affunlabeled
A massive study of M2-brane proposals
Jaume Gomis
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
152
citations
affunlabeled
Thermal fluctuations in a charged AdS black hole
Behnam Pourhassan, Mir Faizal
2015· article· en· Europhysics Letters (EPL)· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
152
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Wilson loops as<i>D</i>3-branes
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
149
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About