MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

271 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
271 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 6

Labels cover 0 of 271 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 271 of 271 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Incidental Learning in 3D Virtual Environments
Wayne W. Thomas, Patricia Boechler
2014· article· en· International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Teaching Styles Typology of Practicing Teachers
Fumiko Yoshida, Gary J. Conti, Toyoaki Yamauchi, Misa Kawanishi
2023· article· en· Journal of Education and Learning· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Study on Learning Styles and Confucian Culture
Asuncion Perez, Myeong-Hee Shin
2016· article· en· Indian Journal of Science and Technology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Association between learning style preferences and choices of teaching method among Iranian faculty members: A cross-sectional online survey
Mohsen Masoumian Hosseni, Somayeh Rajabzadeh, Babak Sabet, Roya Vatankhah, Seyed Mohammad Ebadirad
2024· article· en· Majallah-i dānishkadah-i pizishkī.Dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī va khadamāt-i bihdāshtī- darmānī-i Tihrān./Majallah-i dānishkadah-i pizishkī.Dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī va khadamāt-i bihdāshtī- darmānī-i Tihrān.· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Holes
Rachel Ellaway
2025· editorial· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About