MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Random Matrices and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

489 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
489 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 10

Labels cover 0 of 489 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 489 of 489 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Spectral statistics of Dirac ensembles
Masoud Khalkhali, Nathan Pagliaroli
2022· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundunlabeled
The bead process for beta ensembles
Joseph Najnudel, Bálint Virág
2021· article· en· Probability Theory and Related Fields· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
The bohemian eigenvalue project
Robert M. Corless, Steven E. Thornton
2017· article· en· ACM communications in computer algebra· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bi-Boolean Independence for Pairs of Algebras
Yinzheng Gu, Paul Skoufranis
2017· article· en· Complex Analysis and Operator Theory· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
On free stable distributions
Takahiro Hasebe, Alexey Kuznetsov
2014· article· en· Electronic Communications in Probability· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundunlabeled
Mallows permutations as stable matchings
Omer Angel, Alexander E. Holroyd, Tom Hutchcroft, Avi Levy
2020· article· en· Canadian Journal of Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Upper Tail Bounds for Stationary KPZ Models
Benjamin Landon, Philippe Sosoe
2023· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Hydrodynamic large deviations of TASEP
Jeremy Quastel, Li‐Cheng Tsai
2024· article· en· Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About