MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

474 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
474 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 10

Labels cover 1 of 474 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 474 of 474 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Cognitive processes in the Breakfast Task: Planning and monitoring.
Nathan S. Rose, Lin Luo, Ellen Bialystok, Alexandra Hering, Karen Lau, Fergus I. M. Craik
2015· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
The effects of age and task demands on visual selective attention.
Paula McLaughlin, Carolyn Szostak, Malcolm A. Binns, Fergus I. M. Craik, Steven P. Tipper, Donald T. Stuss
2010· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Growth points in research on memory and hippocampus.
Robert J. Sutherland, Hugo Lehmann, Simon C. Spanswick, Fraser T. Sparks, Neal R. Melvin
2006· review· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Motor maps, seizures, and behaviour.
G. Campbell Teskey, Marie‐H. Monfils, Corey Flynn, Nicole A. Young, Francine van Rooyen, Luke C. Henry +4 more
2008· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
afffundunlabeled
The offline production effect.
Randall K. Jamieson, Jackie Spear
2013· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
afffundunlabeled
Valence does not affect serial recall.
Tamra J. Bireta, Dominic Guitard, Ian Neath, Aimée M. Surprenant
2021· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
Spatial effects on tactile duration categorization.
Simon Grondin, Tsuyoshi Kuroda, Takako Mitsudo
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
Word-learning performance in beginning readers.
Elizabeth S. Nilsen, Derrick C. Bourassa
2008· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Specificity of practice in a ball interception task.
Luc Tremblay, Luc Proteau
2001· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
Eccentricity dependence of the curveball illusion.
Rick Gurnsey, Mathieu Biard
2012· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
Re-reading after mind wandering.
Trish L. Varao-Sousa, Grayden J. F. Solman, Alan Kingstone
2017· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About