MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The International Review of Information Ethics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

308 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20042024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
308 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 7

Labels cover 0 of 308 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 308 of 308 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Know Thyself as a Virtual Reality
Marilène Oliver, Alissa Rossi, Jonathan Cohn
2022· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Reputation in the Cyberworld
Michael Eldred
2013· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Pluralism about the Value of Privacy
William Bülow
2011· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Why Does AI Companionship Go Wrong?
Ziwei Gao
2024· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Teaching Information Ethics in an iSchool
David J. Saab
2010· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Occupy the Heterotopia
James K. Anderson, Kiran Bharthapudi, Hao Cao
2012· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Psychotechnologies of Digital Diplomacy
Natalia Grincheva
2012· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
African Women and the Internet
Netiva Caftori
2007· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Polyhedral: Recycling Boundary Ecologies
Paul Carter
2009· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Critical archives for decolonial literacies
Pedro Rafael Díaz y Díaz
2021· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Internet as an Ethical Challenge for Religions
Chibueze Udeani, Rafael Capurro, Johannes J. Frühbauer
2008· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Myth of Automated Meaning
James Walter Caufield
2006· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
A trench in the fight against disinformation
J. Salgado Borges, Arthur Coelho Bezerra
2021· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Ethics in Deploying Data to make Wise Decisions
T. Venu Gopal
2007· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Pragmatic Actions or Ethics Needed?
Thomas Hausmanninger
2004· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Student Privacy: Harm and Context
Mark MacCarthy
2014· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Exploring Gender Bias in Search Engines
Calvin Hillis, Ebrahim Bagheri, Zack Marshall
2024· article· en· The International Review of Information Ethics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About