MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,298 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,298 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 40 of 46

Labels cover 6 of 2,298 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,298 of 2,298 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
What is Bitcoin Ontario and How Does it Work?
2021· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Fine Print in Smart Contracts
Joshua S. Gans
2019· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A Prehistory of the Cloud. Tung-Hui Hu
Mina Momeni
2018· article· en· Digital Scholarship in the Humanities· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Rich specifications for Ethereum smart contract verification
Christian Bräm, Marco Eilers, Péter Müller, Robin Sierra, Alexander J. Summers
2021· preprint· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A Game Theoretic Analysis of Resource Mining in Blockchain
Rajani Singh, Ashutosh Dhar Dwivedi, Gautam Srivastava, Agnieszka Wiszniewska‐Matyszkiel, Xiaochun Cheng
2018· preprint· en· IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Compact Certificates of Collective Knowledge.
Silvio Micali, Leonid Reyzin, Georgios Vlachos, Riad S. Wahby, Nickolai Zeldovich
2020· preprint· en· DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Keynote Speaker 3: Scaling Blockchains
Abdelhakim Senhaji Hafidh
2022· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Blockchain & Bitcoin
Jason Butcher
2018· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About