MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3199093805

E-money Transaction: Its Problems And Solutions

2017· article· en· W3199093805 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roma Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueTrinity Journal of Management, IT & Media · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatabase transactionElectronic moneyCommerceCurrencyBusinessMoney measurement conceptCredit cardFinancial transactionCryptocurrencyATM cardDigital currencyTransparency (behavior)Order (exchange)CashComputer securityPaymentEconomicsVelocity of moneyMonetary economicsComputer scienceFinanceDatabase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

World has moved towards the cashless transactions and in this order to using E-money Transaction some countries like Belgium, France, Canada etc. have adopted totally cashless transaction system. I think the first requirement for the cashless transaction is to avoid fake currency and others are easy transaction, transparency, development of E-commerce etc.E money is the basic pillar of cashless transaction and even the people of progressive country are also adopting very frequently in place of hard cash and during Demonetisation the E-money transaction was the main relief for Indian people and even it was used for purchasing the teas, chhole bhatoore , samosas etc.through the E-money transactions via Paytm etc but due to cases of fraud this system is unable to reach its deserving place.The first Question is, what E-money is so E-money is the short form of the Electronic Money, the money which is stored in Electonic Device/modes or used through electronically with the help of internet computerized Server.Basically E-money can be divide in two parts 1. Card based and Network based. Card based E-Money Includes Debit card,Credit Card, ATM card etc. and Network Based E-money includes Paytm, Proton, BHIM app etc. E-money transaction is need of present era but the safety for its user is also very important because 1. Our Cyber system is not ready to protect completely this type of transaction. 2. Users are not aware for their rights and cyber solutions available to them and 3. Carelessness of the users to provide the opportunities tothe cyber-criminal.The use of the E-money is adopting by the people at large but our system like banks government agencies, cyber cells, police etc. are not taking suitable steps as per the ratio and situations. However in order to safety and cyber solutions the Information Technology Act-2000 has been enacted but the lack of skilled officer are also a big problem. In case of Cyber Crime victim can report in the police station under which jurisdiction he reside or where his bank situate or where the incident took place and the matter will be investigated only by the Competent/Designated officer. E-money Users must be aware with tricks of Cyber Criminals and should take safety steps properly with due care and cautions, the Cyber fraudsters/Criminals use phishing, malware, money mule, sim cloning , card fraud , vishing , ATM Skimming and sometime also fraud committed also by the E-money user.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.015
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrinity Journal of Management, IT & Media→Same topicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security→French-language works237,207→