MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,605 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,605 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 40 of 53

Labels cover 2 of 2,605 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,605 of 2,605 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
The word superiority effect overcomes crowding
June Cutler, Alexandre Bodet, Josée Rivest, Patrick Cavanagh
2024· article· en· Vision Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Double meanings for reading
Alexander Leff, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
2025· letter· en· Brain· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Reading, Psychology of
Simon Garrod, Meredyth Daneman
2005· other· en· Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
L’été, c’est fait pour lire !
Nathalie Chapleau, Fanie Lauzon, Jeanne Morissette
2021· article· fr· Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Stones from a Glasshouse
Joe Stouffer, Janice Van Dyke
2023· article· en· Journal of Teaching and Learning· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Newspeak for epidemiologists
Clarence C. Tam
2007· editorial· en· Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Explaining Dyslexia
Gavin Reid
2016· other· en· Dyslexia· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About