MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 42 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Fate of quantum black holes
Viqar Husain, Jarod George Kelly, Robert Santacruz, Edward Wilson-Ewing
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Categorical quantum volume operator
Alexander Hahn, Sebastian Murk, Sukhbinder Singh, Gavin K. Brennen
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Teleparallel gravity at null infinity
Florian Girelli, Jianhui Qiu, Céline Zwikel
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Piezoaxionic effect
Asimina Arvanitaki, Amalia Madden, Ken Van Tilburg
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Strange physics of dark baryons
Gonzalo Alonso-Álvarez, Gilly Elor, Miguel Escudero, Bartosz Fornal, Benjamı́n Grinstein, Jorge Martin Camalich
2022· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quantum backreaction on a classical universe
Viqar Husain, Suprit Singh
2021· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Slowly moving black holes in khronometric model
Andrew Kovachik, Sergey Sibiryakov
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Leptonic probes of alternative left-right symmetric models
Mariana Frank, Benjamin Fuks, Sumit K. Garg, Chayan Majumdar, P. Poulose, Supriya Senapati
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About