MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,504 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,504 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 43 of 51

Labels cover 1 of 2,504 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,504 of 2,504 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Short-cuts on quantum network simulators
Anubhav Srivastava, Devendra Mishra, Madhuri Annavazzala, A. Antony Franklin, Nixon Patel, M. V. Panduranga Rao
2021· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Reverse-Type Data Processing Inequality
Paula Belzig, Li Gao, Graeme Smith, Peixue Wu
2025· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Hyper-Entanglement in Time and Frequency
Piotr Roztocki, Alfonso Carmelo Cino, Brent E. Little, David Moss, Lucia Caspani, William J. Munro +11 more
2019· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum frequency conversion for use in quantum repeaters
William Fredrick Losin, Sai Sreesh Venuturumilli, Michael E. Reimer, Rubayet Al Maruf, Paul Anderson, Michael Z. Li +4 more
2024· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Linear optics implementation of symmetric matchgates
Alessandro Fedrizzi, Sven Ramelow, M. P. Almeida, Matthew A. Broome, B. P. Lanyon, Aephraim M. Steinberg +1 more
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Practical Quantum Optics
Gerd Leuchs
2023· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Variable strength measurements of non-local observables
Noah Lupu-Gladstein, Hugo Ferretti, Weng-Kian Tham, Arthur O. T. Pang, Aephraim M. Steinberg, Kent Bonsma-Fisher +1 more
2020· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum enhanced precision metrology for quantum networks
M. V. Jabir, Riley B. Dawkins, Javier Sabines-Chesterking, Dileep V. Reddy, Adriana E. Lita, Abdella Battou +1 more
2024· article· en· Quantum 2.0 Conference and Exhibition· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About