MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2134910799 · doi:10.1109/ismvl.2005.13

Classical vs Quantum Fingerprinting

2005· article· en· W2134910799 on OpenAlexafffund
Barry C. Sanders

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsQubitComputer scienceRandomnessQuantum entanglementQuantumFingerprint (computing)Binary numberString (physics)Theoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsArithmeticComputer securityStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When communication is expensive, the important task of testing two binary strings for equality can be achieved by generating relatively short fingerprints of each string and comparing those fingerprints. Quantum fingerprinting, in which the fingerprint is encoded onto qubits (the quantum version of the bit), is significantly less expensive: exponentially better in the case of no shared randomness and potentially perfect for the case of shared entanglement. Single-qubit quantum fingerprinting is feasible, and we have demonstrated its advantages theoretically and experimentally

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→