MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,794 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,794 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 49 of 56

Labels cover 2 of 2,794 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,794 of 2,794 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Turbulent Mixing With Density Differences
Jos Derksen
2011· article· en· ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference: Volume 1, Symposia – Parts A, B, C, and D· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviews
Edward S. Krebes, Ray Wood, Patrick R. Taylor
2019· article· en· The Leading Edge· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
GAC Spotlight
Michael Burianyk
2006· article· en· The Leading Edge· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Apache Energy – Knowledge Management System
Shane Attwell, Michelle Moses
2004· article· en· SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Conference listing
2002· article· en· Hydrological Processes· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
E&P Notes (October 2017)
Joel Parshall, Stephen Whitfield, Pam Boschee
2017· article· en· Journal of Petroleum Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Expert Systems
T.S. Ramesh
2000· other· en· Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
An Object in Motion Stays in Motion
Jarrett Dragani
2016· article· en· The Way Ahead· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Emerging Technologies
A.C. Mogensen
2004· article· en· Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About