MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

19,583 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
19,583 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 392

Labels cover 47 of 19,583 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 19,583 of 19,583 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Phylogenetic relationships of cyphelloid homobasidiomycetes
Philomena Bodensteiner, Manfred Binder, Jean‐Marc Moncalvo, Reinhard Agerer, David S. Hibbett
2004· article· en· Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
What are mycorrhizal traits?
V. Bala Chaudhary, E. Penelope Holland, Charman-Anderson Suw, Aidee Guzman, Lukas Bell‐Dereske, Tanya E. Cheeke +13 more
2022· review· en· Trends in Ecology & Evolution· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
112
citations
affunlabeled
Amino Acid Uptake in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Plants
Matthew D. Whiteside, Maria O. Garcia, Kathleen K. Treseder
2012· article· en· PLoS ONE· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
109
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Current trends, limitations and future research in the fungi?
Kevin D. Hyde, Petr Baldrián, Yanpeng Chen, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Sybren de Hoog, Mingkwan Doilom +24 more
2024· article· en· Fungal Diversity· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
109
citations
affunlabeled
MycoDB, a global database of plant response to mycorrhizal fungi
V. Bala Chaudhary, Megan A. Rúa, Anita J. Antoninka, James D. Bever, Jeffery B. Cannon, Ashley Craig +27 more
2016· article· en· Scientific Data· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
The long hard road to a completed <i>Glomus intraradices</i> genome
F. Martin, V. Gianinazzi‐Pearson, Mohamed Hijri, Peter J. Lammers, Natalia Requena, Ian R. Sanders +4 more
2008· article· en· New Phytologist· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
101
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About