MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,441 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,441 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 29

Labels cover 90 of 1,441 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,441 of 1,441 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundvenueno abstractunlabeled
Food in Focus: Youth Exploring Food in Schools Using Photovoice
Rebecca Spencer, Jessie‐Lee D. McIsaac, Melissa Stewart, Sara Brushett, Sara Kirk
2019· article· en· Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
Ethics and Visual Research Methods
2016· book· en· Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Staging Testimony in Nanay
Geraldine Pratt, Caleb Johnston
2013· article· en· Geographical Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Concept Mapping of Photovoices
Nasim Haque, Scott R. Rosas
2010· article· en· Family & Community Health· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
The case for and Against Doing Virtual Photovoice
John L. Oliffe, Nina Gao, Mary T. Kelly, Calvin C. Fernandez, Hooman Salavati, Matthew Sha +2 more
2023· article· en· International Journal of Qualitative Methods· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Photovoice: A participatory method for information science
Lisa M. Given, Anna Opryshko, Heidi Julien, Jorden Smith
2011· article· en· Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Entangled (in the) Sticks
Diane Conrad
2006· article· en· Qualitative Inquiry· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
26
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About