MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

635 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
635 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 13

Labels cover 0 of 635 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 635 of 635 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Alexia and related reading disorders
Daniel N. Bub
2003· review· en· Neurologic Clinics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Recovery of personal neglect.
Marco Iosa, Cecilia Guariglia, Alessandro Matano, Stefano Paolucci, Luigi Pizzamiglio
2016· article· en· PubMed· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
afffundunlabeled
True functional ability of chronic stroke patients
William J. Tippett, Lisa D. Alexander, Mireille N. Rizkalla, Lauren E. Sergio, Sandra E. Black
2013· article· en· Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
There’s little return for attentional momentum.
Janice J. Snyder, William C. Schmidt, Alan Kingstone
2009· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
A toggle switch of visual awareness?
Ada Le, Bobby Stojanoski, Saniah Khan, Matthew T. Keough, Matthias Niemeier
2014· article· en· Cortex· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Directional collisions during a route-following task
Nicole A. Thomas, Dane Stuckel, Carl Gutwin, Lorin Elias
2009· article· en· Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Lateral biases in lighting of abstract artwork
David McDine, Ian J. Livingston, Nicole A. Thomas, Lorin Elias
2010· article· en· Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent
Marc Hurwitz, Derick Valadao, James Danckert
2011· article· en· Experimental Brain Research· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About