MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 51 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Conformally coupled scalar in rotating black hole spacetimes
Finnian Gray, Ian Holst, David Kubizňák, Gloria Odak, Dalila Pîrvu, T. Rick Perche
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating the Wald entropy from two-derivative terms in quadratic actions
Ram Brustein, Dan Gorbonos, Merav Hadad, A. J. M. Medved
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Instability of regular electric black hole
S. N. Sajadi, Mohammad Bagher Jahani Poshteh, S. H. Hendi
2021· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Soliton mechanics
Sharmila Gunasekaran, Uzair Hussain, Hari K. Kunduri
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Evidence for an algebra of G2 instantons
Michele Del Zotto, Jihwan Oh, Yehao Zhou
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The gravity/CFT correspondence
2013· article· en· The European Physical Journal C· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Holographic Higgs Phases
Moshe Rozali, Darren Smyth, Evgeny Sorkin
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Electron in higher-dimensional weakly charged rotating black hole spacetimes
Marco Cariglia, Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, David Kubizňák
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Superconformal monodromy defects in ABJM and mABJM theory
Igal Arav, Jerome P. Gauntlett, Yusheng Jiao, Matthew M. Roberts, Christopher Rosen
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Dissonant black droplets and black funnels
Sebastian Fischetti, Jorge E. Santos, Benson Way
2017· article· en· Apollo (University of Cambridge)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Shape dynamics in 2 + 1 dimensions
2012· article· en· General Relativity and Gravitation· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Null Polygons in Conformal Gauge Theory
Enrico Olivucci, Pedro Vieira
2022· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The topological cigar observables
Sujay K. Ashok, Jan Troost
2006· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
[no title]
Pietro Benetti Genolini, Matan Grinberg, Paul Richmond
2021· article· en· Research Portal (King's College London)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Classical group field theory
2012· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Complexity, scaling, and a phase transition
Jiayue Yang, Andrew R. Frey
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About