MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The Lancet
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,654 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,654 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 52 of 54

Labels cover 27 of 2,654 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,654 of 2,654 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Celebrating Everest
David Sharp
2003· article· en· The Lancet· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Department of Error
2022· article· en· The Lancet· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Colonic or coelomic?
Jonathan Lachapelle, Lucy Gilbert, Giovanni Artho, Thierry Alcindor, Ramila Amre, Jocelyne Arseneau +1 more
2010· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sania Nishtar is the health leader that the world needs
George A.O. Alleyne, Cary L. Cooper, Pekka Puska, Robert Beaglehole, Ruth Bonita, Alexandre Kalache +2 more
2017· letter· en· The Lancet· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
IL12B promoter polymorphism and asthma
Andrew J. Sandford, Peter D. Paré
2002· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Masking harm: dust, diseases, and industry
Bruno J. Strasser, Thomas Schlich
2025· article· en· The Lancet· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Sex ratio in India
Margaret A. Somerville
2006· letter· en· The Lancet· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The GAS trial
Beverley A. Orser, Alex S. Evers, Santhanam Suresh, Sharon Hertz
2016· letter· en· The Lancet· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Two hard lessons
Paul W. Armstrong
2003· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
How up-to-date are Cochrane Reviews
Mike Clarke, Prathap Tharyan, Sally Green
2008· article· en· The Lancet· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Remember to look below
Gabor Kandel
2003· article· en· The Lancet· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The MANAGE trial – Authors' reply
P.J. Devereaux, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Gordon Guyatt, Kumar Balasubramanian, Salim Yusuf
2019· letter· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Implications of defibrillation
G. Bryan Young, Andrew D. Krahn
2004· article· en· The Lancet· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Old letters, new rules
Michael O’Connor
2003· letter· en· The Lancet· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
Canada's global health role – Authors' reply
Stephanie Nixon, Kelley Lee, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, James Blanchard, Slim Haddad, Steven J. Hoffman +1 more
2018· letter· en· The Lancet· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Light brought to a standstill
Simon Mitton
2001· article· en· The Lancet· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Finalising the WHO Pandemic Agreement for a safer future
Walid Ammar, Christopher Baggoley, Felicity Harvey, Yasmin Ali Haque, Jeremy Konyndyk, Youngmee Jee +3 more
2025· letter· en· The Lancet· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About