MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 53 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Lifshitz solitons
Robert B. Mann, L. Pegoraro, Marius Oltean
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Gravitational collapse in anti de Sitter space
David Garfinkle
2004· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Jet quenching and the gravity dual
Mohammed Mia, Charles Gale
2009· article· en· Nuclear Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Families of<i>N</i>= 2 strings
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
A holographic bound for D3-brane
2017· article· en· The European Physical Journal C· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Warp drive aerodynamics
Carlos Barceló, Valentin Boyanov, Luis J. Garay, Eduardo Martín-Martínez, José M. Sánchez Velázquez
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Gluing Hexagons at Three Loops
Benjamin Basso, Vasco Gonçalves, Shota Komatsu, Pedro Vieira
2015· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Chiral anomalies in black hole spacetimes
Valeri P. Frolov, Alex Koek, Jose Pinedo Soto, Andrei Zelnikov
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Bounds on triangle anomalies in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>
Ying-Hsuan Lin, David O. Meltzer, Shu-Heng Shao, Andreas Stergiou
2020· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
CSW-like expansion for Einstein gravity
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Supersymmetric models on AdS<sub>2</sub>
D. G. C. McKeon, T. N. Sherry
2001· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The symplectic potential for leaky boundaries
Robert McNees, Céline Zwikel
2025· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
afffundunlabeled
Inhomogeneous metrics on complex bundles in Lovelock gravity
Cristóbal Corral, Borja Diez, Daniel Flores-Alfonso, Nelson Merino, Leonardo Sanhueza
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About