SUMMING RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS TO THE EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When one uses the Coleman–Weinberg renormalization condition, the effective potential V in the massless [Formula: see text] theory with O(N) symmetry is completely determined by the renormalization group functions. It has been shown how the (p + 1) order renormalization group function determine the sum of all the N p LL order contribution to V to all orders in the loop expansion. We discuss here how, in addition to fixing the N p LL contribution to V, the (p + 1) order renormalization group functions can also be used to determine portions of the N p+n LL contributions to V. When these contributions are summed to all orders, the singularity structure of V is altered. An alternate rearrangement of the contributions to V in powers of ln ϕ, when the extremum condition V′(ϕ = v) = 0 is combined with the renormalization group equation, show that either v = 0 or V is independent of ϕ. This conclusion is supported by showing the LL , …, N 4 LL contributions to V become progressively less dependent on ϕ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".