MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 82

Labels cover 359 of 4,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,076 of 4,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A simplified guide to randomized controlled trials
Amar Bhidé, Prakesh S. Shah, Ganesh Acharya
2018· review· en· Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
296
citations
affunlabeled
Analysis and Reporting of Factorial Trials
Finlay A. McAlister, Sharon E. Straus, David L. Sackett, Douglas G. Altman
2003· review· en· JAMA· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
295
citations
affunlabeled
How to design efficient cluster randomised trials
Karla Hemming, Sandra Eldridge, Gordon Forbes, Charles Weijer, Monica Taljaard
2017· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
290
citations
affunlabeled
Including Non‐Randomized Studies
Barnaby C Reeves, Jonathan J Deeks, Julian P. T. Higgins, George A. Wells
2008· other· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
287
citations
affunlabeled
Systematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research
Michael Saini, Aron Shlonsky
2012· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
249
citations
affunlabeled
Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions
Forough Farrokhyar, Paul J. Karanicolas, Achilleas Thoma, Marko Šimunović, Mohit Bhandari, P.J. Devereaux +3 more
2010· review· en· Annals of Surgery· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
245
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About