MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 60 of 82

Labels cover 359 of 4,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,076 of 4,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Predictive Values
Stephen D. Walter
2005· other· en· Encyclopedia of Biostatistics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Systematic Reviews and the Evolving Role of Librarians
Shannon Gordon, Rebecca Hutchinson
2014· other· en· UWSpace (University of Waterloo)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
When you cannot trust what you see: The confounding effect
Luis H. Braga, Muhammet İrfan Dönmez, Anka Nieuwhof-Leppink, Salvatore Cascio, Christina B. Ching, Massimo Garriboli +4 more
2024· editorial· en· Journal of Pediatric Urology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
When Evidence Doesn't Work
Lindsay Glynn
2007· article· en· Evidence Based Library and Information Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
<i>AJRCCM</i> : Strength in Breadth
Andrew Bush, Fernando J. Martínez, Laurent Brochard, Sanjay H. Chotirmall, MeiLan K. Han
2023· editorial· en· American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
2020–2021 Reviewers—Consultants 2020–2021
2021· article· fr· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+metaepi_broadgpt · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broadmodels split
The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tyler Pitre, Sarah Kirsh, Tanvir Jassal, Mason Anderson, Adelia Padoan, Alexander Xiang +2 more
2023· review· en· medRxiv· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_broadconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Improving the Reporting of Observational Trials
Daniel Bainbridge
2021· editorial· en· Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
<scp>CONSORT</scp>
David Moher
2014· other· en· Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
ONLINE ACCESS TO RESEARCH PAPERS – CHANGES OVER TIME
Julie Burke, Goeran Fiedler
2018· article· en· Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Keeping Up with the Standards
Antony Porcino
2015· article· en· International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to Dr Pan
Matthew Chong, Nicolas M. Berbenetz, Cheng Lin, Sudha Singh
2017· letter· en· Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Stephen D. Walter
2005· other· en· Encyclopedia of Biostatistics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Correspondence: Re: Scrivener et al
Julie Vaughan‐Graham, Camila Torriani‐Pasin, Miguel Benito-Garcia, Konstantinos Kypriglis-Kypriotis, Agnieszka Śliwka
2021· letter· it· Journal of physiotherapy· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About