MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

41,706 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
41,706 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 631 of 835

Labels cover 82 of 41,706 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 41,706 of 41,706 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian Studies in the New Millennium
William Lawton
2008· article· en· British Journal of Canadian Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Bâtir et écrire Québec au féminin
Chantal Théry
2008· article· fr· Érudit (Université de Montréal)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Le cinéma québécois aux rayons X
Marie-Claude Loiselle
2001· article· fr· Érudit (Université de Montréal)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
S'organiser pour négocier ?
Annelise Rodrigo
2019· preprint· fr· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Issue #1 - September 23, 2003
Chris Spraakman
2004· article· en· Pro Tem· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Une grande famille acadienne : Les Leblanc
Sylvie Tremblay
2004· article· fr· Érudit (Université de Montréal)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
La Galerie du Nouvel-Ontario à Sudbury
Cécile Boucher
2006· article· fr· Érudit (Université de Montréal)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Who should own land in Saskatchewan
Annette Aurélie Desmarais, Darrin Qualman, André Magnan, Nettie Wiebe
2015· article· en· oURspace (University of Regina)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Book Reviews
2010· article· en· Open Collections· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About