MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,914 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,914 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 66 of 79

Labels cover 2 of 3,914 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,914 of 3,914 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Le retard de maturation visuelle; un cas clinique
Marie-Ève Corbeil
2009· article· fr· Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The spatial and neural deficit of human amblyopia
C. E. Stewart, MJ Moseley, A R Fielder, AB Morland, K. L. MacRae
2008· article· en· Acta Ophthalmologica· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Main sequence of human luminance-evoked pupil dynamics
Jonathan Coutinho, Jeff Huang, Philippe Lefèvre, Gunnar Blohm, Douglas P. Munoz
2024· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Vision, neurosciences et réadaptation
Claude Giasson, Christian Casanova
2010· article· fr· Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Motion Analysis Of Radar Targets
Shikhar Mann, S. Haykin
2005· article· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Pink illusions and white shifts
Stuart Anstis, Sae Kaneko, Patrick Cavanagh
2024· article· en· i-Perception· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
9. Within-Object Attentional Allocation Biases
Natalie McGlynn
2017· article· en· Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The double-drift illusion biases the marmoset oculomotor system
Nicholas M. Dotson, Zachary W. Davis, Jared M. Salisbury, Stephanie E. Palmer, Patrick Cavanagh, John H. Reynolds
2023· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
VISION AND ACTION.
Sophie Wuerger
2000· article· en· Brain· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Amblyopic Perceptual Suppression Revealed
Janine D. Mendola
2016· letter· en· Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About