MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,307 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,307 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 27

Labels cover 2 of 1,307 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,307 of 1,307 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Eskimo‐Aleut Languages
Alana Johns
2010· article· en· Language and Linguistics Compass· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Distributed Morphology <sup>1</sup>
Daniel Siddiqi
2010· article· en· Language and Linguistics Compass· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundunlabeled
The ‘experiential’ as an existential past
Sihwei Chen, Jozina Vander Klok, Lisa Matthewson, Hotze Rullmann
2020· article· en· Natural Language & Linguistic Theory· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Is the meta-language really natural?
Lisa Matthewson
2003· article· en· Theoretical Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Discourse-driven V-to-C in Early Modern Romanian
Gabriela Alboiu, Virginia Hill, Ioanna Sitaridou
2014· article· en· Natural Language & Linguistic Theory· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Restrictions on definiteness insecond language acquisition
Lydia White, Alyona Belikova, Paul Hagström, Tanja Kupisch, Öner Özçelik
2012· article· en· Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Deriving inverse order
Diane Massam
2010· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Bare singulars and singularity in Turkish
Yağmur Sağ
2021· article· en· Linguistics and Philosophy· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
The Construction of Words
Geert Booij
2017· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Parasitic degree phrases
Jon Nissenbaum, Bernhard Schwarz
2010· article· en· Natural Language Semantics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Chinese Classifiers and Count Nouns
Byeong-uk Yi
2009· article· en· Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
General Phraseology
Igor Mel’čuk
2023· book· en· Lingvisticae investigationes. Supplementa· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Events, Time and the Simple Form
Walter Hirtle
2009· article· en· Revue québécoise de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
BRIDGING THE CATEGORY DIVIDE
Henrí Cohen, Claire Lefebvre
2005· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Phases and binding of reflexives and pronouns in English
Réjean Canac-Marquis
2005· article· en· Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Semantics
Igor Mel’čuk
2015· book· en· Studies in language companion series· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Halkomelem Denominal Verb Constructions
Donna B. Gerdts, Thomas E. Hukari
2008· article· en· International Journal of American Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Preverbal ge- in Old and Middle English
Thomas McFadden
2015· article· en· ZAS Papers in Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About