MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Rindler quantum gravity
Bartłomiej Czech, Joanna L. Karczmarek, Fernando Nogueira, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2012· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
affunlabeled
Complexity of mixed states in QFT and holography
Elena Cáceres, Shira Chapman, Josiah Couch, Juan Hernandez, Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan
2020· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Superconductivity from D3/D7: holographic pion superfluid
Pallab Basu, Jianyang He, Anindya Mukherjee, Hsien-Hang Shieh
2009· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
String theory and string Newton–Cartan geometry*
2019· article· en· Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
104
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dual boundary conditions in 3d SCFT’s
Tudor Dimofte, Davide Gaiotto, Natalie M. Paquette
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
103
citations
affunlabeled
Conical Defects in Higher Spin Theories
Alejandra Castro, Rajesh Gopakumar, Michael Gutperle, Joris Raeymaekers
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
afffundunlabeled
Viscoelastic hydrodynamics and holography
Jay Armas, Akash Jain
2020· preprint· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
affunlabeled
Soft hair as a soft wig
Raphael Bousso, Massimo Porrati
2017· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Repulsive forces and the weak gravity conjecture
Ben Heidenreich, Matthew Reece, Tom Rudelius
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black hole thermodynamics with conical defects
Michael Appels, Ruth Gregory, David Kubizňák
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
afffundunlabeled
Evaporating black holes coupled to a thermal bath
Hong Zhe Chen, Zachary Fisher, Juan Hernandez, Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan
2021· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
101
citations
affunlabeled
How classical are TeV-scale black holes?
Saurya Das
2004· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Emergent times in holographic duality
Samuel Leutheusser, Hong Liu
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
affunlabeled
Holographic complexity is nonlocal
Zicao Fu, Alexander Maloney, Donald Marolf, Henry Maxfield, Zhencheng Wang
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Probing 𝒩 = 4 SYM with surface operators
Nadav Drukker, Jaume Gomis, Shunji Matsuura
2008· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thermodynamics of Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes
Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Anomaly inflow and thermal equilibrium
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
98
citations
affunlabeled
Weyl corrections to holographic conductivity
Adam Ritz, John Ward
2009· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
98
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comment on "The black hole final state"
2004· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
97
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic holes in higher dimensions
Robert C. Myers, Junjie Rao, Sotaro Sugishita
2014· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
97
citations
affunlabeled
Counting 1/8-BPS Dual-Giants
Gautam Mandal, Nemani V. Suryanarayana
2006· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
97
citations
affunlabeled
More on McVittie’s legacy: A Schwarzschild–de Sitter black and white hole embedded in an asymptotically<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math>cosmology
Kayll Lake, Majd Abdelqader
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
97
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About