MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

6,765 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
6,765 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 84 of 136

Labels cover 2 of 6,765 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 6,765 of 6,765 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Binary population synthesis for blue stragglers
Xin Chen, Zhanwen Han
2010· article· en· Astrophysics and Space Science· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
D/H ALONG THE LINE OF SIGHT OF REJ 1738+665
J. Dupuis, Cristina Oliveira, G. Hébrard, H. W. Moos, Paule Sonnentrucker
2008· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Electromagnetic Signatures of Mirror Stars
Isabella Armstrong, Berkin Gurbuz, David Curtin, Christopher D. Matzner
2024· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Polaris and its Kin
D. G. Turner, Joyce Ann Guzik, Paul A. Bradley
2009· preprint· en· AIP conference proceedings· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Investigating episodic mass loss in evolved massive stars
S. de Wit, A. Z. Bonanos, Konstantinos Antoniadis, Emmanouil Zapartas, A. Ruiz, N. Britavskiy +5 more
2024· preprint· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Diving into the planetary system of Proxima with NIRPS
A. Suárez Mascareño, Étienne Artigau, L. Mignon, X. Delfosse, Neil J. Cook, F. Bouchy +135 more
2025· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Are magnetic fields universal in O-type multiple systems?
S. Hubrig, S. P. Järvinen, I. V. Ilyin, M. Schöller, Rahul Jayaraman
2023· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About