Bibliographic record
Abstract
A review is presented of the past 165 years of observation of the 4‐day Cepheid Polaris, including the exciting results of the last 50 years, an interval that has produced three orbital solutions for the spectroscopic binary subsystem, recently resolved by HST, parameters for the optical companion, precise measurement of the star’s trigonometric parallax and angular diameter, evidence for a rapid increase in its pulsation period, and observations of the dramatic decline and recent partial recovery of its light amplitude. There has been considerable discussion about the exact nature of the star, with potential resolutions summarized here. It is also noted that many of the star’s characteristics are shared by a small number of other Cepheids that display rapid period increases identical to those predicted for stars in the first crossing of the instability strip, small light amplitudes, and intrinsic colors typical of variables lying near the center of the strip, where Cepheids of largest amplitude normally reside. While all members of the group appear to display the canonical traits of first crossers of the instability strip, Polaris has one unique peculiarity: a brief hiatus in its monotonic period increment between 1963 and 1966 during which the pulsation period underwent a dramatic decrease. Has the average brightness of the Cepheid also increased over the last millennium?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".