MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,166 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,166 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,166 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,166 of 1,166 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
R v Stone [1999] 2 SCR 290
Bernadette McSherry
2000· article· en· Psychiatry Psychology and Law· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
The central question and the scope of nursing research
E. J. Moulton, Rosemary Wilson, Pilar Camargo‐Plazas, Kathryn Halverson
2018· article· en· Nursing Philosophy· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Integrative Forces in Contemporary Medicine
Kerr L. White, John S.L. Browne, E. D. Wittkower
2010· article· en· Acta psychotherapeutica, psychosomatica et orthopaedagogica/Acta psychotherapeutica et psychosomatica· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Culpable Ignorance and Mental Disorders
Matthieu Doucet, Dylon McChesney
2019· article· en· Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Theory, experience and practice
Michael Loughlin, Jonathan Fuller, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Kirstin Borgerson
2016· editorial· en· Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The troubling story of blood-driven dementias
Marie Rieux, Melanie Alpaugh, Francesca Cicchetti
2018· article· en· Molecular Psychiatry· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to Critics
Sophia Moreau
2021· article· en· Jurisprudence· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Walther Riese (1890–1976)
Frank W. Stahnisch, Stephen Pow
2014· article· en· Journal of Neurology· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About