MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,128 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,128 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 43

Labels cover 7 of 2,128 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,128 of 2,128 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Design-Based Research
Terry Anderson, Julie Shattuck
2012· article· en· Educational Researcher· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2,040
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Measuring Self-Regulated Learning
Philip H. Winne, Nancy E. Perry
2000· book-chapter· en· Elsevier eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,307
citations
affunlabeled
Knowledge Building
Marlene Scardamalia, Carl Bereiter
2005· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,154
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Affective Learning — A Manifesto
Rosalind W. Picard, Seymour Papert, Walter Bender, Bruce Blumberg, Cynthia Breazeal, David Cavallo +4 more
2004· article· en· BT Technology Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
506
citations
affunlabeled
The Psychology of Academic Achievement
Philip H. Winne, John C. Nesbit
2009· review· en· Annual Review of Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
282
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning
Allyson F. Hadwin, John C. Nesbit, Dianne Jamieson‐Noel, Jillianne Code, Philip H. Winne
2007· article· en· Metacognition and Learning· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
274
citations
affvenueunlabeled
A Brief History of Knowledge Building
Marlene Scardamalia, Carl Bereiter
2010· article· en· Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
212
citations
affunlabeled
Making thinking visible
Yongcheng Gan, Marlene Scardamalia, Huang‐Yao Hong, Jianwei Zhang
2007· article· en· Computer-supported collaborative learning/˜The œComputer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
201
citations
affgemma · stsgpt · stsmodels agree
Scientific literacy as collective praxis
Wolff‐Michael Roth, Stuart Lee
2002· article· en· Public Understanding of Science· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
197
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About