MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Interactive and Immersive Displays
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,127 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,127 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 23

Labels cover 2 of 1,127 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,127 of 1,127 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Interactive public ambient displays
Daniel Vogel, Ravin Balakrishnan
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
648
citations
affunlabeled
Phidgets
Saul Greenberg, Chester Fitchett
2001· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
648
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Tangible bits
Hiroshi Ishii
2008· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
516
citations
affunlabeled
Proxemic interaction
Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, Saul Greenberg
2010· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
401
citations
affunlabeled
1 € filter
Géry Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, Daniel Vogel
2012· preprint· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
392
citations
affunlabeled
Pressure widgets
Gonzalo Ramos, Matthew Boulos, Ravin Balakrishnan
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
312
citations
affunlabeled
ILoveSketch
Seok-Hyung Bae, Ravin Balakrishnan, Karan Singh
2008· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
292
citations
affunlabeled
Organic user interfaces
David Holman, Roel Vertegaal
2008· article· en· Communications of the ACM· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
264
citations
affunlabeled
Surface drawing
Steven Schkolne, Michael Pruett, Peter Schröder
2001· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
263
citations
affunlabeled
Measuring errors in text entry tasks
R. William Soukoreff, I. Scott MacKenzie
2001· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
237
citations
affunlabeled
Paper windows
David Holman, Roel Vertegaal, Mark Altosaar, Nikolaus F. Troje, Derek Johns
2005· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
214
citations
afffundunlabeled
Visual touchpad
Shahzad A. Malik, Joe Laszlo
2004· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
212
citations
afffundunlabeled
<i>TiltText</i>
Daniel Wigdor, Ravin Balakrishnan
2003· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
197
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Gestures in the wild
Uta Hinrichs, Sheelagh Carpendale
2011· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
194
citations
affunlabeled
Fitts' law and expanding targets
Michael J. McGuffin, Ravin Balakrishnan
2005· article· en· ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
174
citations
afffundunlabeled
Shallow-depth 3d interaction
Mark Hancock, Sheelagh Carpendale, Andy Cockburn
2007· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
173
citations
afffundunlabeled
The fat thumb
Sebastian Boring, David Ledo, Xiang Chen, Nicolai Marquardt, Anthony Tang, Saul Greenberg
2012· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
155
citations
affunlabeled
Conductor
Peter Hamilton, Daniel Wigdor
2014· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
152
citations
afffundunlabeled
How people use orientation on tables
Russell Kruger, Sheelagh Carpendale, Stacey D. Scott, Saul Greenberg
2003· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
148
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fluid integration of rotation and translation
Russell Kruger, Sheelagh Carpendale, Stacey D. Scott, Anthony Tang
2005· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
147
citations
affunlabeled
Shadow reaching
Garth Shoemaker, Anthony Tang, Kellogg S. Booth
2007· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
141
citations
affunlabeled
3D User Interfaces: New Directions and Perspectives
Doug A. Bowman, Sabine Coquillart, Bernd Froehlich, Michitaka Hirose, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa +1 more
2008· article· en· IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
138
citations
affunlabeled
Sticky tools
Mark Hancock, Thomas ten Cate, Sheelagh Carpendale
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
137
citations
venueno affunlabeled
BlueTable
Andrew D. Wilson, Raman Sarin
2007· article· en· Proceedings· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
affunlabeled
Boom chameleon
Michael Tsang, George Fitzmaurice, Gordon Kurtenbach, Azam Khan, Bill Buxton
2002· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction
Roel Vertegaal
2003· article· en· Communications of the ACM· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
125
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Skin buttons
Gierad Laput, Robert Xiao, Xiang Chen, Scott E. Hudson, Chris Harrison
2014· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
124
citations
affunlabeled
HybridPointing
Clifton Forlines, Daniel Vogel, Ravin Balakrishnan
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
119
citations
affunlabeled
Virtual shelves
Frank Chun Yat Li, David Dearman, Khai N. Truong
2009· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
118
citations
affunlabeled
The vacuum
Anastasia Bezerianos, Ravin Balakrishnan
2005· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
116
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About