MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

949 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
949 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 19

Labels cover 1 of 949 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 949 of 949 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Fractal image denoising
Mohsen Ghazel, G.H. Freeman, Edward R. Vrscay
2003· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Image Processing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
117
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Uniform Distribution in Model Sets
Robert V. Moody
2002· article· en· Canadian Mathematical Bulletin· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
84
citations
affunlabeled
A semi-invertible operator Oseledets theorem
Cecilia González‐Tokman, Anthony Quas
2013· article· en· Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Lattice animals and heaps of dimers
Mireille Bousquet‐Mélou, Andrew Rechnitzer
2002· article· en· Discrete Mathematics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
affunlabeled
Leaf conjugacies on the torus
Andy Hammerlindl
2013· article· en· Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
76
citations
affunlabeled
Mating Siegel quadratic polynomials
Michael Yampolsky, Saeed Zakeri
2000· article· en· Journal of the American Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
62
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gradients on Fractals
Alexander Teplyaev
2000· article· en· Journal of Functional Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Brownian Motion Penetrating Fractals
Takashi Kumagai
2000· article· en· Journal of Functional Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
55
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Lattice substitution systems and model sets
Jeong-Yup Lee, Robert V. Moody
2001· article· en· Discrete & Computational Geometry· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
54
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Ruelle-Sullivan map for actions of ℝn
Johannes Kellendonk, Ian F. Putnam
2006· article· de· Mathematische Annalen· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Chaos induced by regular snap-back repellers
Yuming Shi, Pei Yu
2007· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
53
citations
affunlabeled
Cantor Minimal Systems
Ian F. Putnam
2018· book· en· University lecture series· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
Primitive divisors in arithmetic dynamics
Patrick Ingram, Joseph H. Silverman
2008· article· en· Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Amenability of linear-activity automaton groups
Gideon Amir, Omer Angel, Bálint Virág
2013· article· en· Journal of the European Mathematical Society· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Herman’s theory revisited
2009· article· en· Inventiones mathematicae· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Diffraction of Weighted Lattice Subsets
Michael Baake
2002· article· en· Canadian Mathematical Bulletin· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Finite configurations in sparse sets
Vincent Chan, Izabella Łaba, Malabika Pramanik
2016· article· fr· Journal d Analyse Mathématique· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
On Bost–Connes type systems for number fields
Marcelo Laca, Nadia S. Larsen, Sergey Neshveyev
2008· article· en· Journal of Number Theory· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mating Non-Renormalizable Quadratic Polynomials
Magnus Aspenberg, Michael Yampolsky
2008· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About