MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,266 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,266 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 26

Labels cover 1 of 1,266 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,266 of 1,266 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Continuous Multivariate Distributions
N. Balakrishnan
2014· other· en· Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
838
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Power Lindley distribution and associated inference
M. E. Ghitany, D. K. Al-Mutairi, N. Balakrishnan, Latifa Alenezi
2013· article· en· Computational Statistics & Data Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
391
citations
affunlabeled
The gamma-exponentiated exponential distribution
Miroslav M. Ristić, N. Balakrishnan
2011· article· en· Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
362
citations
affunlabeled
Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Model Validity
Catherine Huber‐Carol, N. Balakrishnan, M. S. Nikulin, Mounir Mesbah
2002· book· en· Birkhäuser Boston eBooks· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
202
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Bivariate generalized exponential distribution
Debasis Kundu, Rameshwar D. Gupta
2008· article· en· Journal of Multivariate Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
168
citations
affunlabeled
Lagrangian Probability Distributions
P. C. Consul, Felix Famoye
2006· book· en· Birkhäuser-Verlag eBooks· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
87
citations
affunlabeled
SOME RESULTS ON REVERSED HAZARD RATE ORDERING
Rameshwar D. Gupta, Asok K. Nanda
2001· article· en· Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About