MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Advances in Classification Research Online
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

18 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20062019
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
18 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 18 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 18 of 18 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Universality is Inescapable
Claudio Gnoli, Rick Szostak
2015· article· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
A Review of Boundary Objects in Classification Research
Eva Hourihan Jansen
2013· review· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
6
citations
affunlabeled
The Boundaries of Classification
Jens‐Erik Mai
2009· article· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Arts and Humanities
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Classification in Terms of Basic Concepts
Rick Szostak
2013· article· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
A Review of Boundary Objects in Classification Research
Eva Hourihan Jansen
2013· review· en· Advances in Classification Research Online· Business, Management and Accounting
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About