MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Controlled Clinical Trials
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

31 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002004
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
31 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 1 of 31 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 31 of 31 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Studying Adherence to Therapeutic Regimens
Lawrence R. Brawley, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed
2000· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
133
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The DOSE study
Andrea Dunn, Madhukar H. Trivedi, James B. Kampert, Camillia G. Clark, Heather Chambliss
2002· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
107
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Letter to the editor
Mohit Bhandari, Robin R. Richards, Sheila Sprague, Emil H. Schemitsch
2001· letter· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Locating Study Subjects
E. Suárez Menéndez, Mary Castle White, Jacqueline P. Tulsky
2001· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
27
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Women's Angiographic Vitamin and Estrogen trial:
Judith Hsia, Edwin L. Alderman, Joel Verter, William J. Rogers, Paul D. Thompson, Barbara V. Howard +11 more
2002· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The role of the data coordinating center in the DIG trial
William O. Williford, Joseph F. Collins, Anne Horney, Gail Kirk, Frances McSherry, Susan Stinnett +5 more
2003· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
8
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Crossing international boundaries
Sheila Hewson, Julie Weston, Mary E. Hannah
2002· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The role of the pharmacy coordinating center in the DIG trial
Carol L. Fye, William H. Gagne, Dennis W. Raisch, Mark S. Jones, Mike R. Sather, Sandra L. Buchanan +5 more
2003· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Overview of the DIG trial
Joseph F. Collins, Debra Egan, Salim Yusuf, Rekha Garg, William O. Williford, Nancy L. Geller +1 more
2003· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Lessons learned from the DIG trial
Debra Egan, Nancy L. Geller, Salim Yusuf, Rekha Garg, Joseph F. Collins, James Mathew +2 more
2003· article· en· Controlled Clinical Trials· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About