MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Experimental Economics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

47 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
47 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 47 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 47 of 47 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Multitasking
Thomas Buser, Noemi Peter
2012· article· en· Experimental Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
affunlabeled
Risk aversion and framing effects
Louis Lévy‐Garboua, Hela Maafi, David Masclet, Antoine Terracol
2011· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affunlabeled
Clever enough to tell the truth
Bradley J. Ruffle, Yossef Tobol
2016· article· en· Experimental Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affunlabeled
Learning to alternate
Jasmina Arifovic, John O. Ledyard
2018· article· en· Experimental Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundunlabeled
Why choice lists increase risk taking
David Freeman, Guy Mayraz
2018· article· en· Experimental Economics· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
Individualism, collectivism, and trade
Aidin Hajikhameneh, Erik O. Kimbrough
2017· article· en· Experimental Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Sealed-bid versus ascending spectrum auctions
Nicholas C. Bedard, Jacob K. Goeree, Philippos Louis, Jingjing Zhang
2023· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Strategies in the multi-armed bandit
Stanton Hudja, D. C. Woods
2025· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Task completion without commitment
David Freeman, Kevin Laughren
2024· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Risk preferences and contract choices
Jean-Louis Bago, Bruce Shearer
2022· article· en· Experimental Economics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About